Categories
Public Health Reflection

The Flint Water Crisis – The Physician’s Role

Flint, Michigan is a community of 100K residents, the majority of whom are African-American or of lower socioeconomic status. In the recent Democratic debate held in Flint, one mother spoke to the huge challenges that plague the community, including mold in classrooms, unqualified teachers, and the water crisis. In 2014, city officials decided to switch from the Detroit water supply, which gets fresh water from Lake Huron, to the Flint River, which has a long history of contamination, particularly with lead.

Flint residents knew of this contamination and saw brown water flowing in from their taps. They complained for years, long before the media hype, but city officials ignored their voices. Some residents noticed clumps of their hair falling out and an odd taste and smell to the water they were drinking.1

To investigate these claims, Dr. Mona Hanna-Attisha, a pediatrician at Hurley Medical Center and assistant professor at Michigan State University, conducted a city-wide study on the water in Flint. When she recognized that there were alarming levels of lead in the water, she alerted the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).2 Only then did elected officials start taking residents’ complaints to heart.

Dr. Hanna-Attisha earned the Freedom of Expression Courage Award as well as the respect and gratitude of her patients and peers by speaking up. However, the brave doctor tells CNN in an interview that she was attacked viciously by the state of Michigan when she first presented her research and tried to warn officials of the ongoing crisis. She says she felt “physically ill”3 because of the backlash and professionally vulnerable because her reputation as a physician and researcher was at stake.

Despite the potential professional consequences, Dr. Hanna-Attisha fought for her patients and for the children of Flint, Michigan. In doing so she sent out an important message to physicians: sometimes we must be the voice of the people. It is our responsibility to fight for our patients, whether that means exposing a public health crisis, or more mundane daily tasks like calling health insurance agents to get a patient’s medication covered.

Flint is not the only city in the United States that is dealing with public health crises. However, this particular crisis and Dr. Hanna-Attisha’s role in bringing it to light serves as a reminder for all physicians and medical students: we are public servants and have an obligation to report public health issues in order to ensure the safety of our patients and the general population.

As the notable English physician Sir Henry Howarth Bashford once said, “After all we are merely servants of the public, in spite of our M.D.s and hospital appointments”. Let us not forget this role as we continue through medical school and enter into our practices.

Sources:
1http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/01/mother-exposed-flint-lead-contamination-water-crisis
2http://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/flint-water-crisis/2016/01/30/flint-water-lead-health-qa/79475642/
3http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/21/health/flint-water-mona-hanna-attish/

Featured image:
The Flint River, August 2014 by George Thomas

Categories
Forensics

Forensic Pathologists: Public Servants

In this second part of my three part series on forensic pathology, I will be exploring the role of the forensic pathologist in society at large. Of all the specialties, forensic pathology seems to be largely ignored and/or unknown to the medical students I have met. Certainly, the prospect of working with dead patients doesn’t appeal to the majority of medical students, but hopefully a review of what forensic pathologists do will remind everyone that we should not take for granted the important social role they fill. In her book Postmortem: How Medical Examiners Explain Suspicious Deaths, Stefan Timmermans puts it the following way:

“Death is not an individual but a social event. When, with a barely noticeable sigh, the last gasp of air is exhaled, the blood stops pulsating through arteries and veins, and neurons cease activating the brain, the life of a human organism has ended. Death is not official, however, until the community takes notice.”

Many practicing physicians are surprisingly hazy on the subject, which becomes a problem when these physicians improperly fill out death certificates (a common occurrence which drains public resources to straighten out) or fail to recognize deaths as suspicious and warranting investigation.

Medical examiners are usually certified forensic pathologists who have been appointed to the medical examiner position as an employee of the government. They serve a vital role in the government’s public health systems; if a public health danger emerges of an unknown nature and is killing members of the community, who better to solve this pressing puzzle than a medical examiner? When death occurs under unexpected or unknown circumstances, i.e. when it is suspicious, then the probability that a public health danger is lurking about increases. If we don’t know why people are dying, how do we know who is at risk? How can we mitigate the threat? It is the responsibility of the medical examiner to figure this out, whether the threat is a murderer, an infectious disease, a faulty product on the market, etc.

When death occurs under certain circumstances, the body and investigation come under the jurisdiction of the medical examiner. In fact, by law (in San Francisco at least), a medical examiner must investigate the following types of deaths: violent, sudden, unusual, unattended by a physician in the last 20 days or with no medical history, related to an accident (either old or recent), homicide, suicide, due to an infectious epidemic, anything due to criminal acts, all deaths in operating rooms or following surgery or a major medical procedure, all deaths in prisons, jails, or of a person under the control of a law enforcement agency. Some of these categories are purposefully vague, in order to encourage doctors and other agencies to contact the medical examiner if the death is questionable in any regard whatsoever.

Medical examiners have the responsibility to unearth public health threats as they investigate all of these unusual deaths. For example, it was medical examiners who helped identify the mysterious and deadly powder distributed through the U.S. Postal Service in 2001 as anthrax, and who determine infant deaths are caused by defective cribs on the market, and who do the initial work in identifying infectious disease epidemics.

Bacillus anthracis
A photomicrograph of Bacillus anthracis bacteria using Gram-stain technique, courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Public Health Image Library (PHIL)

Clearly, forensic pathology is essential in maintaining a safe and just society in modern times. Well trained medical examiners performing top-notch forensic work ensures the timely, correct identification of threats to the community. Their role as public servants should never be taken for granted. They may work behind the scenes, but their work is necessary for our society’s high standards of well-being.

 

Featured image:
the colour of blood by anjamation